← All Research Resources

Data Provenance

Water Budget Balance Sheet

json
meta
title

Regional Water Budget Balance Sheet

version

1.0.0

as Of

2026-02-23

units

million acre-feet per year (MAF/yr)

source

USGS water-use data, state water plans, engineering capture model estimates

classification

measured (demand/supply) + modeled (capture/recharge)

note

Captures current state and ASR-augmented projections. Natural recharge alone cannot sustain current withdrawal rates in any region.

regions
region

Ogallala (High Plains)

current Withdrawal

16.5

natural Recharge

3

deficit

-13.5

asr Capture Target

4

net With A S R

-9.5

investment B

4365

notes

Largest deficit. ASR helps but cannot close the gap alone — demand reduction essential. Southern HP most critical.

region

Central Valley (CA)

current Withdrawal

8

natural Recharge

2.5

deficit

-5.5

asr Capture Target

3.5

net With A S R

-2

investment B

825

notes

SGMA mandates sustainability by 2040/2042. ASR + managed aquifer recharge can close most of the gap in wet years.

region

Edwards (TX)

current Withdrawal

1.8

natural Recharge

1.2

deficit

-0.6

asr Capture Target

1.5

net With A S R

0.9

investment B

106

notes

Karst system with good recharge potential. SAWS ASR (120K AF) already operational — proven model for expansion.

region

Denver Basin (CO)

current Withdrawal

0.8

natural Recharge

0.3

deficit

-0.5

asr Capture Target

0.8

net With A S R

0.3

investment B

176

notes

Confined aquifer system. Lower recharge potential but growing demand from Front Range population growth.

region

Basin & Range (AZ/NV)

current Withdrawal

5

natural Recharge

1.5

deficit

-3.5

asr Capture Target

2.5

net With A S R

-1

investment B

5268

notes

Phoenix, Tucson, Las Vegas corridors. Monsoon capture potential significant. Colorado River allocations declining.

totals
current Withdrawal

32.1

natural Recharge

8.5

total Deficit

-23.6

total A S R Capture

12.3

net With A S R

-11.3

note

ASR reduces the deficit by ~52% but cannot eliminate it. Demand management (efficiency, crop switching, conservation) must close the remaining gap.